- Figure 2: Mie scattering against a solid metallic sphere.

Radar back scattering (RBS; red) and forward scattering (FS; blue) cross-sections versus normalized frequency /p. The dielectric permittivity is described by the Drude formula, /p = 10−3 (weak dissipation), where p is the plasma frequency and γ is the collision frequency. Parameter = p*a/c* = 0.7. Calculations using equation (3) and the simplified equation (4) differ less than the thickness of the lines. Inset shows polar scattering diagrams in the *x–z* plane (azimuthal angle = 0 in Mie theory) near the quadrupole resonance of a plasmonic particle. Red lines shows linearly polarized light; blue lines represent non-polarized light.

- Figure 3: Higher-order multipolar Fano resonances in Mie scattering against a solid metallic sphere.

a, Radar back scattering (red) and forward scattering (blue) cross-sections calculated using equation (3) versus normalized frequency /p. The dielectric permittivity is described by the Drude formula, /p = 10−3. The size parameter = p = 1.7. b, Magnetic Fano resonance for a particle with negative , = 1 and size parameter = 0.7. c, d, Contour plots of radar back scattering (c) and forward scattering (d) cross-sections in the vicinity of electric and magnetic quadrupole on the plane {, } parameters in the material with negative refractive index. The size parameter () is equal to 0.7. The insets shows corresponding three-dimensional plots.

- Figure 4: Extinction spectra of non-concentric ring/disk cavity and a plasmonic dolmen structure.

### Language clarification (to me) request

by gerundergrund[quote]

i'll give you +1 for sort of funny < - > 06/26 22:46:47

invisibility cloak via metamaterials, negative index materials, and plasmonic nanostructures...ok then

spare me the details

def regurgs please? :

"invisibility via metamaterials" >>>cheeky designatory reference terminology selection, because what's interdicted is in classified genre- wise as "metamaterial"--the light photons--non material so meta material. Like saying "I'm shooting bullets at him" and not "I'm shooting my gun at him". That's my understanding